Kevin T.

"UI meets AI," implies code is generated, as UI is code, where UX is experience, which is what Figma is used for.

Your logo should be an octopus, "pulpo" means octopus.

Going to your site, I'm greeting with six changing random people @'s, no examples of what the final product would be if I use RamenTools, and clicking the link makes me immediately sign up without knowing what I'm getting. This is poor user experience.

"A better way to document tracking" is kind of an odd sentence construction. I suggest, "A better path to document tracking."

Your PH text says 1800 apps, but your pitch deck shows 1700.

I'm going to suggest you take all that text on your home page and turn it into an inforgraphic or animated video explanation. The people who would want—my opinion/experience—a free AI ad generator don't want to read, they want to click buttons and get the instant gratification your site promises.

I use Cleanmymac, and I know how much I pay for it. This app cheats, getting you to download, then sand-bagging you with a premium membership cost WITHOUT posting the upgrade information here or on their website.

"Cutting edge technology" is a sales phrase from the 80s, like, "Next level." Please write better copy.

You're all following me, so you should vote in this pole.

Why would a copywriter care about wireframing? I have 20 years in UX and 30 in design, and have also written copy, and have never once heard of a copywriter creating wireframes.

On your site, if I narrow the search to a particular kind of app--SaaS, E-Commerce--I can't uncheck the selection when I want to refocus the search. Am I incorrect?

Your text says, "Work with components becomes easy and amusing" but I think you mean, "Work with components becomes easy and fun." Also, "Elevate your design prowess with ultimate design system," should be, "Elevate your design prowess with the ultimate design system." Lastly, what is the product? A stand-alone application, or is it related to something like Figma?

...that is an ugly website for a company professing to help with design.

If the turnaround time is the same for each level of subscription, why bother listing it?

Your thumbnail says %100," not, "100%."

The design of the fat footer is all over the place. Some of the text is left justified, some is centered, some is stacked, some in a line.

I'm sure the tool is great, but why is the example video so clunky?